Awareness and Attitudes Toward Implantable Electrical Medical Technologies Among Syrian Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Main Article Content

Aya Kourkmaz
Aya Kazan
Dr. Zein Al-Abideen Douba
Dr. Mohammad Haroun

Abstract

Background: Implantable electrical medical technologies (IEMTs) such as pacemakers, cochlear implants, deep brain stimulators, and insulin pumps are transforming modern healthcare by providing innovative diagnostic and therapeutic options. Their successful adoption in clinical settings depends not only on technical availability but also on the readiness, awareness, and attitudes of future healthcare professionals. In Syria, a country facing significant educational and infrastructural challenges, little is known about how medical students perceive and engage with these emerging technologies. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the awareness, attitudes, and perceived readiness of Syrian medical and health sciences students toward IEMTs, and to explore their primary sources of information, perceived benefits, and concerns. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional online survey was conducted in April 2025. A total of 506 undergraduate students and interns from medicine, pharmacy, dentistry, nursing, and biomedical engineering at both public and private universities across Syria participated in the study. The validated Arabic questionnaire comprised 27 items, covering demographic data, knowledge and exposure to IEMTs, attitudes toward their integration into education and clinical practice, and willingness to pursue specialisation in the field. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and visualised through tables and charts. Results: Approximately 66% of respondents reported prior awareness of IEMTs, with cardiac pacemakers and insulin pumps being the most familiar devices among them. Online platforms accounted for 42% of information sources, while only 12% of students had direct interaction with patients using such devices. More than 85% believed that IEMTs are beneficial for healthcare advancement, and 73% supported incorporating them into university curricula. Despite these positive attitudes, students highlighted significant concerns regarding long-term safety, affordability, limited local training facilities, and regulatory gaps. Over 60% expressed interest in pursuing further education or specialization in IEMTs. Conclusion: Syrian medical students demonstrate strong enthusiasm and favourable perceptions toward IEMTs, despite limited academic exposure and clinical experience. These findings underscore the urgent need for curriculum reform, enhanced practical training, and policy development to better prepare future healthcare professionals for integrating advanced medical technologies into clinical practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Aya Kourkmaz, Aya Kazan, Dr. Zein Al-Abideen Douba, and Dr. Mohammad Haroun , Trans., “Awareness and Attitudes Toward Implantable Electrical Medical Technologies Among Syrian Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Survey”, IJAPSR, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 21–28, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.54105/ijapsr.E4083.05050825.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Aya Kourkmaz, Aya Kazan, Dr. Zein Al-Abideen Douba, and Dr. Mohammad Haroun , Trans., “Awareness and Attitudes Toward Implantable Electrical Medical Technologies Among Syrian Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Survey”, IJAPSR, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 21–28, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.54105/ijapsr.E4083.05050825.
Share |

References

Sheng H, Zhang X, Liang J, Shao M, Xie E, Yu C, et al. Recent Advances in Energy Solutions for Implantable Bioelectronics. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2021;10(17):2100199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100199

Arjmand B, Payab M, Goodarzi P. Biomedical product development: bench to bedside. Springer; 2020.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35626-2

Stanslaski S, Herron J, Chouinard T, Bourget D, Isaacson B, Kremen V, et al. A chronically implantable neural coprocessor for investigating the treatment of neurological disorders. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst. 2018;12(6):1230 45.

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8550817

Moran J, Briscoe G, Peglow S. Current technology in advancing medical education: perspectives for learning and providing care. Academic Psychiatry. 2018;42(6):796 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-018-0920-2

Alrashed FA, Ahmad T, Almurdi MM, Alderaa AA, Alhammad SA, Serajuddin M, et al. Incorporating technology adoption in medical education: a qualitative study of medical students’ perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2024;15:615 25.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S410964

Aamir J, Ali SM, Boulos MNK, Anjum N, Ishaq M. Enablers and inhibitors: a review of mHealth adoption in low and middle income countries. Health Policy Technol. 2018;7(1):88 97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2017.12.010

Alfakhry G, Naeem A, AboHajar MB, Alfakhry A, Mohandes AF, Ali I, et al. Revealing the significant shortcomings in the learning environment at the three largest medical schools in Syria: what’s next? BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):2.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-04032-7

Das TM, Kaur G, Nematollahi S, Ambinder D, Shafer K, Sulistio M, et al. Medical education in the digital Era: a new paradigm for acquiring knowledge and building communities. JACC. 2022;100031. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.100031

Masoumian Hosseini ST, Qayumi K, Pourabbasi A, Haghighi E, Sabet B, Koohpaei A, et al. Are we ready to integrate modern technologies into the medical curriculum for students? A systematic review. Discover Education. 2025;4(1):114.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00092-7

Peprah P, Abalo EM, Agyemang-Duah W, Gyasi RM, Reforce O, Nyonyo J, et al. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Use of mHealth Technology Among Students in Ghana. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019;19(1):220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0939-3

Boillat T, Otaki F, Baghestani A, Zarnegar L, Kellett C. A landscape analysis of digital health technology in medical schools. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-04887-x

Allam AH, Eltewacy NK, Alabdallat YJ, Owais TA, Salman S, Ebada MA. Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception of Arab Medical Students Towards AI in Medicine and Radiology. European Radiology. 2024;34(7):1 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-09763-3

Alameddine M, Bou-Karroum K, Hijazi MA, El-Jardali F. Exploring the attitudes of medical students toward robotic surgery and advanced surgical technologies: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03548-7

Singh A, Jadon RS, Baitha U, Sethi P, Kaur H, Kumar A, et al. Indian Medical Student Perspectives on the Online Mode of Education. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2022;11(7):3915 22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1008_21

Oluwadiya KS, Adeoti AO, Agodirin SO, Nottidge TE, Usman MI, Gali MB, et al. Exploring artificial intelligence in the Nigerian medical educational space. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2023;30(4):285 92. https://journals.lww.com/npmj/Fulltext/2023/30040/Exploring_artificial_intelligence_in_the_Nigerian.11.aspx

Mortagy M, Abdelhameed A, Sexton P, Olken M, Hegazy MT, Gawad MA, et al. Online Medical Education in Egypt during COVID-19. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03273-7

Mokresh ME, Muvaffak E, Kahya M, Torun P, 4 CBMFM. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Barriers toward Research among Medical Students. Med Sci Educ. 2024;34(2):387 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-01829-y

Packer S, Mercado N, Haridat A. Bioelectronic medicine—ethical concerns. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2019;9(10):a034363.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a034363

Bogale B, Scambler S, Mohd Khairuddin AN, Gallagher JE. Health System Strengthening in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States. PLoS One. 2024;19(6):e0305234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0305234

Okuda Y, Bond W, Bonfante G, McLaughlin S, Spillane L. Simulation-based education: what every educator should know. Medical Education. 2020;54(1):16 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13874

Shelton P, Corral I, Kyle B. Advancements in undergraduate medical education: meeting the challenges of an evolving world of education, healthcare, and technology. Psychiatric Quarterly. 2017;88(2):225 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11126-016-9471-x

Chang Chan AYC, van Leeuwen M, Custers E, Bleys R, Ten Cate O. Anatomy education in low-resourced countries. Medical Teacher. 2025;47(5):883 93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2303246

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>