Multiscale Modelling of Galaxy Collisions with Integrated Resistive MHD and Stellar Feedback

Main Article Content

Mahdiyeh Khalili

Abstract

Predicting the relative roles of gravitational collapse and stellar feedback in star formation within extreme, low-density environments—such as the tidal tails produced by galaxy mergers—remains a fundamental challenge. These environments provide unique natural laboratories for testing star formation theories under conditions analogous to the early universe. However, existing models often fail to reconcile large-scale gravitational dynamics with localized feedback processes in such diffuse media. To bridge this gap, a reproducible, open-sciencebased theoretical framework is presented that integrates public, multi-wavelength observational datasets with high-resolution **resistive magnetohydrodynamic (MHD)** simulations. Our methodology is built on archival data from three flagship observatories: the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), which is used to study young stellar populations and newly formed clusters. This telescope provides high-resolution infrared imaging and spectroscopy, enabling precise measurements of stellar ages, masses, and dust extinction. - Atacama Large Millimetre/submillimetre Array (ALMA): used to trace cold molecular gas and analyze kinematic structures. These public datasets are used as quantitative constraints in resistive magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations that incorporate magnetic fields, radiative cooling, sub-grid star formation, and stellar feedback, ensuring that the simulation results remain consistent with observational reality. Using the open-source code **PLUTO**, we model the formation of tidal structures while resolving key plasma physics, including **localized resistivity** to capture magnetic reconnection effects. “Synthetic observations” are directly generated from simulation outputs using radiative transfer post-processing, enabling point-by-point comparison with real data. To rigorously quantify agreement between model and observation, we implement a **Bayesian inference framework** that propagates observational uncertainties and yields posterior constraints on key parameters (e.g., magnetic field strength, feedback coupling efficiency). Through this integrated pipeline, the aim is to determine whether star formation efficiency in lowdensity tails is regulated by gravitational confinement from tidal compression or by localized feedback. Expected outcomes include quantitative estimates of virial stability parameters for observed gas complexes, spatial correlation analyses to gauge feedback coupling efficiency, and statistically robust constraints on uncertain model parameters. This framework is fully reproducible: all data are public, simulation codes are opensource, and analysis scripts will be archived with a DOI upon acceptance. By transparently linking theory and observation, this approach provides a methodological blueprint for studying star formation in interacting systems, with direct implications for galaxy evolution models and future observational strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Mahdiyeh Khalili , Tran., “Multiscale Modelling of Galaxy Collisions with Integrated Resistive MHD and Stellar Feedback”, IJAP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 8–13, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.54105/ijap.A1073.06010426.
Section
Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Mahdiyeh Khalili , Tran., “Multiscale Modelling of Galaxy Collisions with Integrated Resistive MHD and Stellar Feedback”, IJAP, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 8–13, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.54105/ijap.A1073.06010426.
Share |

References

Kennicutt, R. C., & Evans, N. J. (2012). Star formation in the Milky Way and nearby galaxies. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 50, 531–594. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125610

Renaud, F., Bournaud, F., & Duc, P.-A. (2015). Tidal dwarf galaxies and missing baryons. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 446(2), 2038–2048. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2208

Komarov, I., Kravtsov, A., & Gnedin, N. (2018). Tidal dwarf galaxies in cosmological simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 478(4), 431–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1015

Whitmore, B. C., & Schweizer, F. (1995). Hubble Space Telescope observations of young star clusters in NGC 4038/4039, ‘the Antennae’ galaxies. The Astronomical Journal, 109(3), 960–980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/117337

Whitmore, B. C., Zhang, Q., Leitherer, C., Fall, S. M., Schweizer, F., & Miller, B. W. (1999). The luminosity function of young star clusters in “the Antennae” galaxies (NGC 4038/4039). The Astronomical Journal, 118(4), 1551–1576. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/301071

Whitmore, B. C., Chandar, R., & Fall, S. M. (2007). Star cluster demographics. The Astronomical Journal, 133(3), 1067–1084.

https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0612695

Piatti, A. E. (2023). The dual nature of the tidal tails of NGC 5904 (M5). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters, 525(1), L72–L75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slad098

Braine, J., Combes, F., van Driel, W., & Casoli, F. (2001). CO observations of molecular gas in tidal dwarf galaxies. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 378, 443–453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011244

Delos, M. S., & Schmidt, F. (2022). Time-varying substructure properties. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 513(3), 3682–3708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1022

Renaud, F., Bournaud, F., & Duc, P.-A. (2021). The virial state of molecular clouds in tidal debris: A comparison with simulations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508(3), 3528–3542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2619

Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. (1972). Galactic bridges and tails. The Astrophysical Journal, 178, 623–666.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/151823

Barnes, J. E., & Hernquist, L. (1996). Transformations of galaxies. II. Gasdynamics in merging disk galaxies. The Astrophysical Journal, 471, 115–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/177957

Pillepich, A., Nelson, D., Hernquist, L., Springel, V., Pakmor, R., Torrey, P., Weinberger, R., Vogelsberger, M., & Marinacci, F. (2018). First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: The stellar mass content of groups and clusters of galaxies. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 475(1), 648–675. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx3112

Geng, A., Kotarba, H., Bürzle, F., Dolag, K., Stasyszyn, F., Beck, A., & Nielaba, P. (2012). Magnetic field amplification and X-ray emission in galaxy minor mergers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 419(4), 3571–3589.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20001.x

Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., Matsakos, T., Tesileanu, O., Zanni, C., & Ferrari, A. (2007). PLUTO: A numerical code for computational astrophysics. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 170(1), 228–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/513316

Villaescusa-Navarro, F., Anglés-Alcázar, D., Genel, S., Spergel, D. N., Somerville, R. S., Dave, R., Pillepich, A., Hernquist, L., Nelson, D., & Torrey, P. (2021). The CAMELS project: Cosmology and astrophysics with machine-learning simulations. The Astrophysical Journal, 915(1), 71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abf7ba

Agertz, O., Kravtsov, A. V., Leitner, S. N., & Gnedin, N. Y. (2013). Toward a complete accounting of energy and momentum from stellar feedback in galaxy formation simulations. The Astrophysical Journal, 770(1), 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/770/1/25

[18] Wright, A. J., & Hawke, I. (2019). A resistive extension for ideal magnetohydrodynamics. *Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society*, 491(4), 5510–5523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2779

Schure, K. M., Kosenko, D., Kaastra, J. S., Keppens, R., & Vink, J. (2009). A new radiative cooling curve based on an up-to-date plasma emission code. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 508(2), 751–758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912495

McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Young, W., & Golap, K. (2007). CASA architecture and applications. In R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell (Eds.), Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI (Vol. 376, p. 127). Astronomical Society of the Pacific. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ASPC..376..127M/abstract

Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., Greenfield, P., Droettboom, M., Bray, E., Aldcroft, T., Davis, M., Ginsburg, A., Price-Whelan, A. M., Kerzendorf, W. E., Conley, A., Crighton, N., Barbary, K., Muna, D., Ferguson, H., Grollier, F., Parikh, M. M., Nair, P. H., … Streicher, O. (2013). Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 558, A33.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

Turk, M. J., Smith, B. D., Oishi, J. S., Skory, S., Skillman, S. W., Abel, T., & Norman, M. L. (2011). yt: A Multi-code Analysis Toolkit for Astrophysical Simulation Data. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 192(1), 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/9

Dullemond, C. P. (2019). RADMC 3D (Version 2.0) [Software]. GitHub. https://github.com/dullemond/radmc3d-2.0

Speagle, J. S. (2020). dynesty: A dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 493(3), 3132–3158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa278