Trade-off Relations in Genuine Four-qubit Nonlocality Systems

Main Article Content

Sk Sahadat Hossain

Abstract

We investigate trade-off relations governing genuine four-qubit nonlocality in multipartite quantum systems. By analyzing the reduced four-qubit density operators obtained from five-qubit generalized GHZ and MS states, we establish nontrivial constraints on the expectation values of the SeevinckSvetlichny operators associated with these subsystems. In particular, we demonstrate that genuine four-qubit nonlocal correlations across different four-qubit reductions are not mutually independent. For both classes of five-qubit states considered, we show that the sum of the maximal squared expectation values of the Seevinck-Svetlichny operators over all four-qubit reductions is subject to a state-dependent upper bound. Furthermore, this collective bound is shown to be tighter than the bounds obtained by independently imposing the maximal allowed expectation value of the Svetlichny operator on each four-qubit subsystem. These results reveal a monogamy-like trade-off structure for genuine four-qubit nonlocal correlations and provide tighter constraints on their simultaneous manifestation in multipartite quantum systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

[1]
Sk Sahadat Hossain , Tran., “Trade-off Relations in Genuine Four-qubit Nonlocality Systems”, IJAP, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 7–12, Oct. 2026, doi: 10.54105/ijap.B1079.06021026.
Share |

References

J. S. Bell, Physics 1, 195 (1964). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1838,works remain significant, see the declaration

J. F. Clauser, M. A. Horne, A. Shimony, and R. A. Holt, Physical Review Letters 23, 880 (1969). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.880,works remain significant, see the declaration

N. Brunner, D. Cavalcanti, S. Pironio, V. Scarani, and S. Wehner, Reviews of Modern Physics 86, 419 (2014).

DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.419,works remain significant, see the declaration

H. Buhrman, R. Cleve, S. Massar, and R. de Wolf, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 665 (2010). DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.665,works remain significant, see the declaration

A. Ajoy and P. Rungta, Phys. Rev. A 81, 052334 (2010). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.81.052334,works remain significant, see the declaration

R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 865 (2009). DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865,works remain significant, see the declaration

R. Gallego, L. E. Würflinger, A. Acín, and M. Navascués, Physical Review Letters 109, 070401 (2012).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.230501,works remain significant, see the declaration

A. K. Ekert, Physical Review Letters 67, 661 (1991).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.661,works remain significant, see the declaration

J. Barrett, L. Hardy, and A. Kent, Physical Review Letters 95, 010503 (2005). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010503,works remain significant, see the declaration

A. Acín, N. Gisin, and L. Masanes, Physical Review Letters 97, 120405 (2007). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.120405,works remain significant, see the declaration

L. Masanes, S. Pironio, and A. Acín, Nature Communications 2, 238 (2011). DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1244,works remain significant, see the declaration

T. R. de Oliveira, A. Saguia, and M. Sarandy, Europhysics Letters 100, 60004 (2012). DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/100/60004,works remain significant, see the declaration

Z.-Y. Sun, Y.-Y. Wu, J. Xu, H.-L. Huang, B.-J. Chen, and B. Wang, Physical Review A-Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 88, 054101 (2013). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.88.054101,works remain significant, see the declaration

M. Pawłowski and Č. Brukner, Physical Review Letters 102, 030403 (2009). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.030403,works remain significant, see the declaration

M. Li, Z. Wang, J. Wang, S. Shen, and S.-M. Fei, Europhysics Letters 125, 20006 (2019). DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/125/20006

G. Svetlichny, Physical Review D 35, 3066 (1987). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3066,works remain significant, see the declaration

N. D. Mermin, Physical Review Letters 65, 1838 (1990). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.1838,works remain significant, see the declaration

J.-D. Bancal, N. Brunner, N. Gisin, and Y.-C. Liang, Physical Review Letters 106, 020405 (2011). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.020405,works remain significant, see the declaration

M. Seevinck and G. Svetlichny, Physical Review Letters 89, 060401 (2002). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.060401,works remain significant, see the declaration

D. Collins, N. Gisin, S. Popescu, D. Roberts, and V. Scarani, Physical Review Letters 88, 170405 (2002).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.170405,works remain significant, see the declaration

S. S. Hossain et al., International Journal of Theoretical Physics 64, 59 (2025). DOI: 10.1007/s10773-025-05925-7

D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, Bell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989) pp. 69-72. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0849-4,works remain significant, see the declaration

W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review A 62, 062314 (2000). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.62.062314,works remain significant, see the declaration

S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Foundations of Physics 24, 379 (1994). DOI: 10.1007/BF02058098,works remain significant, see the declaration

V. Coffman, J. Kundu, and W. K. Wootters, Physical Review A 61, 052306 (2000). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.61.052306,works remain significant, see the declaration

J. Barrett, A. Kent, and S. Pironio, Physical Review Letters 97, 170409 (2006). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.170409,works remain significant, see the declaration

R. Ramanathan and P. Mironowicz, Physical Review A 98, 022133 (2018). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.022133

P. Kurzynski, T. Paterek, R. Ramanathan, W. Laskowski, and D. Kaszlikowski, Physical Review Letters 106, 180402 (2010).

DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.180402,works remain significant, see the declaration

H.-H. Qin, S.-M. Fei, and X. Li-Jost, arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.08848, (2015). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062339,works remain significant, see the declaration

S. Cheng and M. J. Hall, Physical Review Letters 118, 010401 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.010401

L.-J. Zhao, L. Chen, Y.-M. Guo, K. Wang, Y. Shen, and S.-M. Fei, Physical Review A 100, 052107 (2019). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.052107

S. S. Hossain and I. Chattopadhyay, Annals of Physics, 170542 (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2026.170542

C. Branciard, N. Gisin, and S. Pironio, Physical Review Letters 104, 170401 (2010). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.170401, works remain significant, see the declaration

J.-D. Bancal, C. Branciard, N. Gisin, and S. Pironio, Nature Physics 8, 867 (2012). DOI: 10.1038/nphys2460,works remain significant, see the declaration