Evaluation of Implementation of Quality Methodologies in the Engineering Institute of UABC in Mexicali
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This work describes an analysis of the implementation of quality methodologies that generated an improvement in the research, development and teaching activities of the Engineering Institute of Autonomous University of Baja California (EI-AUBC), located in the city of Mexicali. These methodologies are widely used in the industrial sector to prevent accidents, reduce waste, and eliminate rework and to training of workers in any area in the industries. Only that its applications are very little known in the Laboratories of Higher Education Institutions (LHEI) of the Mexican Republic. With this scientific study the results of the investigation activities were more reliability to be take adequate decisions and were made functions with more security taking care of health of researchers and students. The investigation was made in 2019.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Inês C., De Camargo M. (2017). “Current American landscape in laboratory accreditation according to ISO/IEC 17025”, Accreditation Quality Assurance Journal, 22 (1), 57-62. [CrossRef]
Ortega G., Delgado G., Reyes A., Cejas G., Slimani, N. (2009). “Metodología para la gestión de la calidad en la investigación científica en el Instituto Cubano de Investigaciones de los Derivados de la Caña de Azúcar ICIDCA. Sobre los Derivados de la Caña de Azúcar”, 43 (3), 52-59.
Presot I., Pinto R., Madureira A., Alves B., Moderna C. (2014). Quality perception in research laboratories from fiocruz after QMS implementation”, Revista de Administración Publica, Rio de Janeiro, 1 (1), 1-10. [CrossRef]
Ramírez D., Félix M. (1997). “Historia de la Universidad Autónoma de Baja California 1957-1997”, Libro, Gobierno del Estado de Baja California, México.
Ana S., Nogueira R. (2014). “The lead assessor role in the ISO/IEC 17025:2005 accreditation of Brazilian calibration and testing laboratories by the general coordination of accreditation (CGCRE)”, Accreditation Quality Assurance Journal, 19 (1), 127-132. [CrossRef]
Ovretveit J. (2013). “Contemporany quality improvement”, Cadernos de Saúde Pública”, 29 (3) 424-426. [CrossRef]
Frederick S., Myers J. (2010). “Good Laboratory Practices Are Not Synonymous with Good Scientific Practices, Accurate Reporting, or Valid Data”, Environmental Health Perspectives Journal, 118 (2), 60-61. [CrossRef]
Jena G., Chavan S. (2017). “Implementation of Good Laboratory Practices (GLP) in basic scientific research: Translating the concept beyond regulatory compliance”, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology , 89 (1), 20-25. [CrossRef]
Biasini V. (2012). “Implementation of a quality management system in a public research centre”, Accreditation Quality Assurance Journal, 17(1), 1621-626. [CrossRef]
Tweedale T. (2010). “Good Laboratory Practices and Safety Assessments: Another View”, Environmental Health Perspectives Journal, 118 (5), 194-197. [CrossRef]
Andrade E., Bento A., Cavalli J., Oliveira S. Schwanke R., Siqueira J., Freitas C., Marcon R., Calixto J.(2016). “Non-clinical studies in the process of new drug development - Part II: Good laboratory practice, metabolism, pharmacokinetics, safety and dose translation to clinical studies”, Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 1 (1), 1-15. [CrossRef]
Souza R. Docena C., Brum A. (2012). “Implementation of good laboratory practices (NIT-DICLA-035, Inmetro) in a technological platforms network: the Fiocruz experience”, Accreditation and Quality Assurance Journal, v. 17, n. 3, p. 331-339, 2012. [CrossRef]
Leonelli S. (2018). “Rethinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality”, Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, Vol. 36B, Emerald Publishing Limited, 129- 146.Symposium on Mary Morgan: Curiosity, Imagination, and Surprise. [CrossRef]
Jarvis M., Williams M. (2016). “Irreproducibility in Preclinical Biomedical Research: Perceptions, Uncertainties, and Knowledge Gaps”, Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 37 (4), 290-302. [CrossRef]
Marino M. (2014). “The use and misuse of statistical methodologies in pharmacology research”, Biochemical Pharmacology, 87 (1), 78- 92. [CrossRef]
Anderson T., Shattuck J. (2012). “Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?”, Educational Research Journal, 1 (1), 1-10. [CrossRef