Self-Efficacy Beliefs for Technology Integration of University Students in North India: An Empirical Analysis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
A self efficacy belief plays an vital and inevitable role in the formation of perception, behavior, confidence throughout our life. Be it the compatibility with the technology or any another thing. Its use is ubiquitous now days. Technology has creeped and infiltrated in our every facet of life. In this Manuscript empirical analysis is done to understand the integration of the technology with the self efficacy beliefs. To measure the confidence in acceptance, understanding and use of technology in real life projects, online research papers of high index (Scopus, SCI and W.O.S) were referred for secondary data. A modified questionnaire (Ling Wang, Peggy A. Ertmer, Timothy J. Newby) was used as per the requirement of the study. Simple random sampling was used, responses were collected through goggle forms. Cronbach alpha =0.941 indicates the reliability of the scale. The analysis indicates that males and post graduate students are a bit less confident in the computer technological capabilities and strategies. Students in the age group 20-22 years are most confident in the self efficacy and belief of the technological capabilities and strategies, those below 20 years of age are highest instable for the use of technology in real life. If the belief and self efficacy is positive then the confidence in the use of technology in real life projects and in academics will be high and vice-versa. Highly positive correlated.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Fletcher, D. (2006). Technology integration: Do they or don’t they? A self-report surveyfrom PreK through 5th grade professional educators. AACE Journal, 14(3), 207-219. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/19856/
Spires, H. A., Lee, J. K., & Turner, K. A. (2008). Having our say: Middle grade student perspective on school, technologies, and academic engagement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 497-515. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2008.10782518
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2005). Is it age or IT: First steps to understanding the ne generation. In D. Oblinger, & J. Oblinger, (Eds.), Educating the net generation (1). Retrieved from. https://www.educause.edu/research-and-publications/books/educating-net-generation/it-age-or-it-first-steps-toward-understanding-net-generation
Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the livesof 8- to 18- year-olds. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527859.pdf.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/02/28/how-teachers-are-using-technology-at-home-and-in-their-classrooms/
Bandura, Albert (2010), "Self-Efficacy", The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, American Cancer Society, pp. 1–3, ISBN 978-0-470-47921-6, retrieved 2021-03-20. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0836
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Finding Flow, 1997.
Porter, Lyman W.; Bigley, Gregory A.; Steers, Richard M. (2003). Motivation and Work Behavior (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Irwin. pp. 131–132. https://search.worldcat.org/title/50669532
Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Self-efficacy in the workplace: Implications for motivation and performance. International journal of management, business, and administration, 14(1), 1-6. https://nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lunenburg,%20Fred%20C.%20Self-Efficacy%20in%20the%20Workplace%20IJMBA%20V14%20N1%202011.pdf
Conner, M.; P. Norman, eds. (2005). Predicting health behaviour (2nd ed. rev. ed.). Buckingham, England: Open University Press. https://tms.iau.ir/file/download/page/1575186987-predicting-health-behaviour.pdf
Karyn Ainsworth, Fall Quarter Seminar Paper: What is Teaching? / What is Learning? Diffusion of the Internet within a Graduate School of Education, 2. Conceptual Framework 2.3.3.2 Bandura: Efficacy x Value Archived 2007-02-05 at the Wayback Machine. https://www.coursehero.com/file/ps5bfq2/Karyn-Ainsworth-Fall-Quarter-Seminar-Paper-What-is-Teaching-What-is-Learning/
Bandura, A. 1977. “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change”, Psychological Review, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191-215. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Chowdhury, S., Endres,. M, & Lanis, T. W. 2002. “Preparing students for success in teamwork environments: The importance of building confidence”, Journal of Managerial Issues, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 346-359. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284880773
Bandura, A. 1997. “The anatomy of stages of change”, American Journal of Health Promotion, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 8-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8
Bandura, A. 1984. “Recycling misconceptions of perceived self-efficacy”, Cognitive Therapy and Research, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 231-255. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF01172995
Moreno, R., & Kilpatrick, J. 2018. “Student perceptions of self-efficacy in the foreign language classroom: A design-based research study”, Educational Design Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-26. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15460/eder.2.1.1214
Zabihi, R. 2018. “The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing”, Written Communication, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 32-57. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088317735836
Cao, Y., & Philp, J. 2006. “Interactional context and willingness to communicate: A comparison of behavior in whole class, group and dyadic interaction”, System, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 480-493. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.05.002
Yilmaz, C. 2010. “The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: a study of ELT learners in Turkey”, Procedia Social and Behavioural, vol. 2, pp. 682–687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.084
Waaktaar, Trine; Torgersen, Svenn (2013). "Self-Efficacy Is Mainly Genetic, Not Learned: A Multiple-Rater Twin Study on the Causal Structure of General Self-Efficacy in Young People". Twin Research and Human Genetics. 16 (3): 651–660. PMID 23601253. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2013.25
Bandura, Albert; Caprara, Gian Vittorio; Barbaranelli, Claudio; Pastorelli, Concetta; Regalia, Camillo (2001). "Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 80: 125–135. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.125
Firdaus, M. B., Budiman, E., Haviluddin, Wati, M., Setyadi, H. J., & Pakpahan, H. S. (2019). An Openness Of Government Website Content Using Text Analysis Method. In International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (Vol. 8, Issue 5c, pp. 1461–1466). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijeat.e1114.0585c19
Mathew, J., Mukherjee, R., & Nair, S. (2019). Impact of Active Learning Training Design on Self Efficacy Levels of Participants. In International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) (Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 5914–5921). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.d8909.118419
Andarini, N. T., & Purwadi. (2020). The Role of Parents’ Social Support and SelfEfficacy towards Academic Stress. In International Journal of Management and Humanities (Vol. 4, Issue 11, pp. 1–6). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijmh.g0659.0741120
Kumar, Dr. S. (2022). Shilpkar: A Name of Recognition, Struggle and Existence. In Indian Journal of Social Science and Literature (Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 27–30). DOI: https://doi.org/10.54105/ijssl.e1028.091522
Swamini Pandit, Sustainable Development Goals and Media Coverage by English Language News Channel Websites in Indian and International Context. (2020). In International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering (Vol. 9, Issue 4S, pp. 28–32). DOI: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.d1004.094s20