The Reelocene Epoch: Digital Mimesis and the Erasure of Cultural Idiom in Kashmir
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study presents the concept of the Reelocene epoch, characterised by excessive consumption of short-form videos, or reels, on popular platforms such as TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat, with a primary focus on Kashmir. The research examines how local youth, observed in educational settings, are captivated by visual media without recognising its infectious influence on local culture and identity formation. This Reelocene commodifies culture, ruptures the localised value system, and incorporates alien cultural elements that render vulgarity and obscenity aesthetically pleasing. The study uses the conceptual frameworks of cultural capital (Bourdieu) and hyperreality (Baudrillard). The research also examines the capacity of reels to engage teenagers effectively while standardising their use as a factor in cultural exclusion and inclusion. The preference for the influencer or celebrity's verbal expressions, style, and tastes, regarded as culturally superior, contrasts sharply with the local cultural norms, perceived as inferior, and is examined in detail through the observed behaviour of participating students. The study ultimately argues that Reelocene not only endangers culture but also supplants it with its own norms, language, and regulations, posing a threat to the local context.
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/modernity-at-large, works remain significant, see declaration
Girard, R. (1965). Deceit, Desire, and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure (Y. Freccero, Trans.). Johns Hopkins University Press. https://www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/1414/deceit-desire-and-novel, works remain significant, see declaration
Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation (E. C. Parsons, Trans.). Henry Holt and Company. https://archive.org/details/lawsofimitation00tarduoft, works remain significant, see declaration
Hebdige, D. (1979). Subculture: The Meaning of Style. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203139943, works remain significant, see declaration
Muggleton, D., & Weinzierl, R. (Eds.). (2003). The Post-subcultures Reader. Berg Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474215173,works remain significant, see declaration
Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/linguistic-imperialism-9780194371469, works remain significant, see declaration
Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic Genocide in Education—or Worldwide Diversity and Human Rights? Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605482, works remain significant, see declaration
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Winston.https://openlibrary.org/books/OL4422303M/Participant_observation, works remain significant, see declaration
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, works remain significant, see declaration
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150, works remain significant, see declaration
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (R. Nice, Trans.). Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674212770, works remain significant, see declaration
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press. https://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9780745624103,works remain significant, see declaration
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford University Press. https://www.sup.org/books/theory-and-philosophy/dialectic-enlightenment, works remain significant, see declaration
Benjamin, W. (1969). The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. In H. Arendt (Ed.) & H.Zohn (Trans.), Illuminations (pp.
–252). Schocken Books.
https://monoskop.org/images/9/9c/Benjamin_Walter_Illuminations_1969.pdf, works remain significant, see declaration
Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551, works remain significant, see declaration
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). Hill and Wang. https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374521509/mythologies, works remain significant, see declaration
Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and Simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904, works remain significant, see declaration
Debord, G. (1994). The Society of the Spectacle (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Zone Books. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780942299793/the-society-of-the-spectacle/, works remain significant, see declaration
Smith, Z. (2009, February 26). Speaking in Tongues. The New York Review of Books.
https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2009/02/26/speaking-in-tongues-2/, works remain significant, see declaration
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and His World (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Indiana University Press. https://iupress.org/9780253203410/rabelais-and-his-world/, works remain significant, see declaration
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers. https://archive.org/details/antonio-gramsci-selections-from-the-prison-notebooks, works remain significant, see declaration
Muggleton, D. (2000). Inside Subculture: The Postmodern Meaning of Style. Berg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474215173, works remain significant, see declaration