Invisible Sustainability: Gendered Circular Resource Practices and Household Climate Resilience in Rural Bangladesh
Main Article Content
Abstract
Households are not just sites of consumption but dynamic systems that constantly manage, reuse and recirculate resources through everyday practices. This study investigates the household activities of rural women through the lens of ‘household circular resource systems’ (HCRS) to demonstrate how the system generates and contributes to environmental sustainability and household resilience and survives in local resource circulation. This study used qualitative methods and collected data through 35 in-depth interviews, participant observation, and household activity mapping from 30 purposively selected rural households in six villages in Pabna and Sirajganj districts. The data were analysed thematically. The findings suggest that the cyclical use of food waste, water, and compostbased nutrients produces interrelated processes. These processes collectively contribute to environmental sustainability and household resilience through continuous resource regeneration, reduced household waste and expenses, and improved food security and water management. Moreover, the results show that the traditional HCRS is maintained through complex interactions among women’s productive family resources, intergenerational ecological knowledge, and unpaid domestic labour. Rural women also perceive the circular system as a culturally embedded family custom. However, the level of circularity varies with the number of family-owned animals and arable land. Changing rural lifestyles, marked by greater reliance on commercial agricultural products and less control over property and livestock, are slowly undermining traditional circular techniques. This study advances sustainability and circular economy scholarship by conceptualising HCRS as a localised socio-ecological framework. It suggests that sustainable rural development policies should include family adaptability by acknowledging regional environmental practices, encouraging small-scale animal production, and giving residents greater access to fertile land to foster sustainability and resilience in rural society.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Raven, R., Reynolds, D., Lane, R., Lindsay, J., Kronsell, A. & Arunachalam, D. Households in sustainability transitions: A systematic review and new research avenues. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 40, 87–107 (2021). DOI: 10.1016/j.eist.2021.06.005
Foden, M., Browne, A. L., Evans, D. M., Sharp, L. & Watson, M. The water–energy–food nexus at home: New opportunities for policy interventions in household sustainability. Geogr. J. 185, 406–418 (2019). DOI: 10.1111/geoj.12257
Shahbaz, P. et al. Food, energy, and water nexus at household level: Do sustainable household consumption practices promote a cleaner environment? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 12945 (2022). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912945
Cheng, K. M., Tan, J. Y., Wong, S. Y., Koo, A. C. & Amir Sharji, E. A review of future household waste management for a sustainable environment in Malaysian cities. Sustainability 14, 6517 (2022). DOI: 10.3390/su14116517
Greene, M., Hobson, K. & Jaeger-Erben, M. Bringing the circular economy home: Insights from socio-technical perspectives on everyday consumption. Clean. Responsib. Consum. 12, 100157 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100157
Wethal, U. & Hoff, S. C. Circular additions to linear systems? Exploring Norwegian households' engagement with circularity in everyday life. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 115, 103641 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103641
Godin, L. & Langlois, J. Care, gender, and change in the study of sustainable consumption: A critical review of the literature. Front. Sustain. 2, 725753 (2021). DOI: 10.3389/frsus.2021.725753
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (FAO, 2023). https://www.fao.org/gender/the-status-of-women-in-agrifood-systems
Mostari, M. P., Sadrul, S. B., Rahman, M. H. & Islam, M. S. Women's empowerment and livestock development in Bangladesh: A review. Bangladesh J. Livest. Res. 28, 1–15 (2021).
DOI: 10.3329/bjlr.v28i1.72014
Bryan, E., Alvi, M., Huyer, S. & Ringler, C. Addressing gender inequalities and strengthening women's agency to create more climate-resilient and sustainable food systems. Glob. Food Secur. 40, 100731 (2024). DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2023.100731
Lindsay, J., Reynolds, D. O., Arunachalam, D., Raven, R.,& Lane, R. Household sustainability labour and the gendering of responsibility for low-waste living. Sociology 58, 1061–1082 (2024).
DOI: 10.1177/00380385241231737
Palm, J., Lazoroska, D., Valencia, M., Bocken, N. M. P.,& Södergren, K. A gender perspective on the circular economy: A literature review and research agenda. J. Ind. Ecol. 28, 1670–1683 (2024).
DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13554
Turner, K. L., Idrobo, C. J., Desmarais, A. A. & Peredo, A. M. Food sovereignty, gender and everyday practice: The role of Afro-Colombian women in sustaining localised food systems. J. Peasant Stud. 49, 402–428 (2022). DOI: 10.1080/03066150.2020.1786812
Adegbeye, M. J., Salem, A. Z. M., Reddy, P. R. K., Elghandour, M. M.
M. & Oyebamiji, K. J. Waste recycling for the eco-friendly input use efficiency in agriculture and livestock feeding. In Resources Use Efficiency in Agriculture (eds. Kumar,
S., Meena, R. S. &Jhariya, M.
K.),1–45 (Springer, 2020).
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-6953-
_1
Pandey, R. U., Surjan, A. & Kapshe, M. Exploring linkages between sustainable consumption and prevailing green practices in reuse and recycling of household waste: Case of Bhopal city in India. J. Clean. Prod. 173, 49–59 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.227
Romani, S., Grappi, S., Bagozzi, R. P. & Barone, A. M. Domestic food practices: A study of food management behaviours and the role of food preparation planning in reducing waste. Appetite 121, 215–227 (2018). DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.093
Mies, A. & Gold, S. Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 321, 128960 (2021).
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960
Kaza, S., Yao, L. C., Bhada-Tata, P., Van Woerden, F. & Levine, D. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050 (World Bank, 2018). DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1329-0
Hobson, K. Small stories of closing loops: Social circularity and the everyday circular economy. Clim. Change 163, 99–116 (2020).
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-019-02480-z
Rabiu, M. K. & Jaeger-Erben, M. Appropriation and routinisation of circular consumer practices: A review of current knowledge in the circular economy literature. Clean. Responsib. Consum. 7, 100081 (2022). DOI: 10.1016/j.clrc.2022.100081